An Identity Based Pharmacognostical
Profile of Sisymbrium officinale
K. Rajendran2, Bahlul Z.S. Awen2, Eiman Molod Aboalied Sowan2 and R. Vijaya Bharathi1
1Department of Pharmacognosy,
Madras Medical College, Chennai, India.
2Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy,
College of Pharmacy, Al-Jabal Al- Gharbi
University, Al- Zawia, Libya.
ABSTRACT:
This
article presents an identity based pharmacognostical
study of the leaf and stem of Sisymbrium officinale (Brassicaceae). Morphoanatomy of the leaf were studied to aid pharmacognostical and taxonomical identification, using
light and confocal microscopy. The morphological,
anatomical parameters and Physico-chemical profile
presented in this paper may be proposed as parameters to establish the
authenticity of S. officinale
and can possibly help to differentiate the drug from its other related species.
KEYWORDS: Sisymbrium officinale,
Micromorphology, Physico-chemical
INTRODUCTION:
Sisymbrium officinale
(Brassicaceae) is an annual or biennial herb and up to 40 cm high,
leaves are oppositely cleft almost to midrib and flowers are yellow, pink or
white in colour. The whole plant is used as diuretic,
expectorant, cardiotonic, laxative and stomachic.
This plant was at one time known as the 'singer's plant' because of its use in
treating loss of the voice. A strong infusion of the whole plant has been used
in the treatment of throat complaints1.
Despite
the numerous medicinal uses attributed to this plant, there are no pharmacognostical reports on the leaf of this plant. Hence,
the present investigation deals with the identity based pharmacognostical
evaluation of the aerial part of Sisymbrium officinale. The study includes morphological and
anatomical evaluation and preliminary phytochemical
screening of the different extracts the plant.
Plant Material:
Fresh plant Sisymbrium officinale was collected from Al-Zawia,
Libya in the month of March 2010. The
plant was identified, confirmed and authenticated by a Taxonomist and herbarium
specimen bearing voucher No. PP. 102 has been
deposited in the Department of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, Al-Jabal Al- Gharbi University, Al-Zawia, Libya.
Macroscopical and microscopical studies:
The
macroscopy and microscopy of the plant was studied
according to the method of Brain and Turner2. For the microscopical studies, the cross sections were prepared and
stained as per the procedure of Johansen3 and the quantitative
microscopy was studied as per the procedure given by Wallis4. The
powder analysis has been carried out according to the method of Brain and
Turner5. Leaf constants such as vein islet number, veinlet termination number, palisade ratio, stomatal number and stomatal
index were studied according to the method of Evans6.
Physico-chemical
constants:
The
ash values, extractive values, loss on drying, foaming index, swelling index
and volatile oil content were performed according to the official methods
prescribed in Indian Pharmacopoeia7. Fluorescence analysis was
carried out according to the method of Chase and Pratt8 and Kokoski et al9.
Preliminary
phytochemical Studies:
Preliminary
phytochemical Screening was carried out by using
standard procedures described by Harborne10.
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION:
Macrosopy
The plant is an annual or
biennial herb and grows up to 40 cm in height. Leaves are oppositely cleft
almost to midrib, alternate, divided into several, irregularly toothed, narrow
segments on each side and larger angular or roundish terminal segment, middle
and upper leaves smaller, short-stalked or stalkless,
less divided or with no lobes along the side. The basal and lower alternate
leaves are are pinnatifid
with several pairs of narrow lobes. The upper leaves are divided into 3 lobes
(a terminal lobe and 2 lateral ones) or lanceolate-ovate
in shape. The upper surfaces of these leaves are dull green and hairless; their
margins are irregularly dentate or shallowly cleft. The basal and lower leaves
have long petioles, while the upper leaves have short petioles or they are
sessile.
Fig 1: T.S. of Sisymbrium officinale leaf through midrib with
lamina
Abs- Abaxial side; Ads-Adaxial side; Ep- Epidermis; Ph- phloem; Pm- palisade mesophyll; X- xylem; Tu- Trichome
unicellular; Tm- Trichome
multicellular; Co-
Collenchyma;
Cp-
Cortical parenchyma; Pg- Peltate gland; Sp-
Spongy parenchyma; Fv- Fibrovascular bundle; Fi- Fibres;
V- Vessel
Microscopical studies:
T.S of leaf (Fig. 1)
The
leaf is dorsiventral with thin lamina and prominent
midrib. The epidermal layer consists of single layered rectangular cells on
both the sides with a very thick cuticle. The mesophyll
is differentiated into palisade and spongy parenchyma. The palisade cells are 2
layered ,vertically oblong compact layer of cells and does not form continuous
band throughout as it is absent above the vascular bundle as in the midrib. The
spongy parenchyma cells are 2-4 layered, the cells are small. Because of the
prominent fibrovascular bundles, the abaxial side of midrib shows three frequent projections,
which are embedded in both the sides of the vascular bundle and other one is
seen below. The fibrovascular bundles are very
distinct, in which 2-3 layer of vessels arranged on
the group of fibres and forming the bowl shape. The
vascular bundle is single and collateral. Phloem occurs as a thin sheath
beneath the xylem. Calcium oxlate crystals of any
type are absent. In the lateral and upper portion of the vascular bundle occurs
a thin layer of dilated parenchyma cells. The adaxial
side extension is wide with large parenchyma cells. A patch of collenchyma is found above the lower epidermis.
Trichomes
of the epidermal layer are common on the lamina. The covering trichomes are of two types, some are unicellular
non-glandular or covering type others multicellular
covering type. Multicelluar covering trichomes are 2-4 celled, thin walled and occur either on
the lower side or on the upper side of the leaf. The unicellular covering trichomes are short, thick, warty, uniformly narrow and
tapering at the tip. Peltate glandular trichomes without stalk are seen rarely on abaxial side. The glands are 12 to 15 celled, yellowish
brown in color and horizontal plate of radiating cells.
Tu- Trichome unicellular; Tm- Trichome multicellular; Me-
Mesophyll; As-
Anisocytic stomata
T.S. of Young Stem (Fig. 3):
Transverse
section of the stem is more or less circular. There is intact, thick, two
epidermal layers with squarish cells and thick
cuticle. Cortex shows loosely arranged 4-6 layers of parenchyma cells. Single
or group of non-lignified fibres
are seen in cortex region. The vascular bundles are collateral and group
of lignified pericyclic fibres
crown the phloem on its outer side. The vessels are circular, thick walled and
are in long or short radial multiples. Some vessels are big, oval shape with thick
lignified walls. Pith is large and is made of thin walled, big polygonal
parenchyma with intercellular space.
Powder
microscopy:
Leaf
(Fig. 2)
The
trichomes are of two types, some are unicellular
non-glandular or covering type others multicellular
covering type. Multicelluar covering trichomes are 2-4 celled, thin walled and occur either on
the lower side or on the upper side of the leaf. The unicellular covering trichomes are short, thick, warty, uniformly narrow and
tapering at the tip. Anisocytic or cruciferous type
of stomata meaning thereby that stomal pore is
surrounded by 3 or 4 wavy walled unequal subsidiary cells of which one is
invariably smaller than the other two. Fragment portion of mesophyll
shows the palisade zone, two layers of vertically oblong compact layer of cells
and the spongy parenchymatous cells are 3-4 layered.
Ep- Epidermis; C-Cortex;
Pf- Pericyclic
fibres; Ph-
Phloem; Pi- Pith; Fn- Fibre non-lignified;
V- Vessel
Stem
(Fig. 4)
Non-ignified fibres of uniform
thickness, slender and long appear as group. Fibres
are often seen associated with vessels. Vessels are large, reticulate and
annular thickening with numerous bordered pits.
Leaf
constants:
The
leaf constants viz;
the vein islet number, veinlet termination number,
palisade ratio, stomatal number and stomatal index are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Leaf constants of S. officinale
S. No. |
Leaf constants |
Values |
1.
|
Vein islet number |
12 -15 / sq.mm |
2.
|
Veinlet Termination Number |
11 -19 /sq.mm |
3.
|
Stomatal Index a) Adaxial b) Abaxial |
32.9 35.4 |
4.
|
Stomatal number a) Adaxial b) Abaxial |
242.6/ sq.mm 281.2/ sq.mm |
5.
|
Palisade ratio |
6-10 |
Physicochemical parameters:
The physiochemical parameters are mainly used in
judging the purity and the quality of the drug (Table 2). Ash values give an
idea of the earthy matter or inorganic composition or other impurities present
along with the drug. Extractive values give an idea about the chemical
constituents present in the drug as well as useful in the detection of
exhausted or adulterated drugs. The result suggests that the powdered plant
have high water soluble extractive value as compared to other extractive
values. The loss on drying reveals the percentage of moisture present in the
drug. The foaming index and swelling index also studied. The fluorescence
analysis of powdered drug and extracts was studied in both UV and daylight
(Table 3).
Table 2. Physico-chemical
constants S. officinale
S. no |
Parameters |
Values |
I |
Ash values |
|
1 |
Total
ash |
7.40 % w/w |
2 |
Acid
Insoluble Ash |
0.046 % w/w |
3 |
Water
Soluble Ash |
6.92 % w/w |
4 |
Sulphated
Ash |
8.64
% w/w |
II |
Extractive values |
|
5 |
Alcohol soluble Extractive |
4.7 % w/w |
6 |
Water
soluble Extractive |
12
% w/w |
7 |
Non-
volatile Ether soluble Extractive |
2.12
% w/w |
III |
Other parameters |
|
9 |
Mucilage content |
4.06 %w/w |
10 |
Loss
on drying |
2.14
% w/w |
11 |
Swelling index |
4 % w/w |
12 |
Foaming Index |
142.85 |
13 |
Volatile oil content |
0.5 % v/w |
Preliminary phytochemical
screening:
Preliminary phytochemical
screening of the plant extracts showed the presence of terpenoids,
carbohydrates, proteins, steroids, alkaloids and volatile oils (Table 4).
CONCLUSION:
As
there is no pharmacognostic/anatomical work on record
for this much valued traditional drug, the present work was taken up with a
view to lay down standards which could be useful to detect the authenticity of
this medicinally useful plant. Macro and micro morphological standards and
physic-chemical profile discussed can be considered as identifying parameters
to substantiate and authenticate the plant Sisymbrium officinale.
Table
3. Fluorescence analysis of S. officinale powder
S. no |
Treatment |
Day light |
Short UV (254 nm) |
Long UV (365 nm) |
1 |
Powder |
Green |
Greenish blue |
Greenish blue |
2 |
Powder
+ water |
Yellowish green |
Greenish blue |
Greenish blue |
3 |
Powder +1N HCl |
Slight reddish brown |
Blue |
Blue |
4 |
Powder+1N H2SO4 |
Yellow |
Blue |
Dark blue |
5 |
Powder +1N HNO3 |
Brown |
Light blue |
Greenish blue |
6 |
Powder+Acetic acid |
Yellow |
Light green |
Light green |
7 |
Powder + 1N NaOH |
Dark yellowish green |
Dark green |
Dark green |
8 |
Powder +1N KOH |
Green |
Dark green |
Dark green |
9 |
Powder+1NAlc. NaOH |
Dark yellow |
Green |
Dark greenish blue |
10 |
Powder +1NAlc. KOH |
Greenish yellow |
Greenish blue |
Bright Sky blue |
11 |
Powder + Ammonia |
Light yellowish green |
Light bluish yellow |
Dark bluish yellow |
12 |
Powder + Iodine |
Light yellow |
Greenish |
Greenish |
13 |
Powder + FeCl3 |
Greenish brown |
Greenish blue |
Greenish blue |
14 |
Powder + Ethanol |
Bright green |
Blue |
Bluish green |
Table 4. Preliminary Phytochemical Screening of S. officinale
Test |
Hexane |
Benzene |
Chloroform |
Ethyl acetate |
Ethanol |
Water |
Carbohydrates |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
Phytosterols |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
Terpenes |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
Volatile oil |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Lipids and fats |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Saponins |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
Alkaloids |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Phenolic compounds and tannins |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Proteins and amino acids |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
Flavanoids |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
Gums and Mucilage |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+
denotes the presence of the respective class of compounds, - denotes the
absence of the respective class of compounds
REFERENCES:
1)
Bown D (1995): Encyclopaedia of Herbs and their Uses.
Dorling Kindersley, London. pp. 20-31
2)
Brain KR, Turner
TD (1975 a): The Practical Evaluation of Phytopharmaceuticals. Wright-Scientechnica,
Bristol, pp 4-9.
3)
Johansen DA
(1940): Plant Microtechnique,
McGraw Hill, New York, pp 182.
4)
Wallis TE (1958): Text book of Pharmacognosy, 6th ed.,
CBS publication, pp 182.
5)
Brain KR, Turner
TD (1975 b): The Practical Evaluation of Phytopharmaceuticals, Wright-Scientechnica,
Bristol, pp 36-45.
6)
Evans WC, Trease and Evans Pharmacognosy, 15th
edn.,
Saunders, London, 2003, 545-547.
7)
Indian Pharmacopoeia (1996): 4th edn., Vol. II,
Government of India, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Controller of
Publications, New Delhi, pp. A53-A54.
8)
Chase CR, Pratt RJ
(1949): Fluorescence of powdered vegetable drugs with particular reference to
development of a system of identification. J
Am Pharmacol Assoc 38, 32-36.
9)
Kokoshi J, Kokoshi R, Sharma FJ
(1958): Fluorescence of Powdered vegetable drug under ultraviolet radiation, J
Am Pharmcol Assoc 47: 715-717.
10) Harborne, JB(1998): Methods of
extraction and isolation. In: Phytochemical Methods,
Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 60-66.
Received
on 14.06.2010
Accepted on 07.07.2010
© A&V Publication all right reserved
Research Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry.
2(5): Sept.-Oct. 2010, 377-380